<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A quotation about schools and radical change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/</link>
	<description>...Doug Belshaw's teaching-related blog: news, resources and ideas for busy teachers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Belshaw</title>
		<link>http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/#comment-21138</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Belshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/#comment-21138</guid>
		<description>Yes, that does concern me as well. I think governments have a responsibility to step in here through initiatives such as the &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../2007/01/02/majority-in-uk-back-selective-schools/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;One Laptop Per Child Project&lt;/a&gt;. The digital literacy/skills divide could prove to be even larger than the existing inequalities we see in our society. And it&#039;s all to do with access... :-(&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that does concern me as well. I think governments have a responsibility to step in here through initiatives such as the <a href="../../../../2007/01/02/majority-in-uk-back-selective-schools/" rel="nofollow">One Laptop Per Child Project</a>. The digital literacy/skills divide could prove to be even larger than the existing inequalities we see in our society. And it&#39;s all to do with access&#8230; :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Brodie</title>
		<link>http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/#comment-21126</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaching.mrbelshaw.co.uk/index.php/2006/11/11/a-quotation-about-schools-and-radical-change/#comment-21126</guid>
		<description>Interesting quote. Yes, I agree we must become &quot;designers and makers of our own tools&quot;, but I have an issue about equal access to these new tools for the less-than-well-off majority of people on this planet. As long as technology is cost-prohibitive for the poorer members of society, it will never really fulfill any of the promise it holds. I just went to Second LIfe to check it out, and discovered that one has to have a pretty fast computer and &#039;net connection to participate. Satellite connections are no good- guess that leaves me out. We can barely get everyone using fairly modern computers- much less the latest and greatest. Access at libraries is being curtailed in various ways, and the promise of the fast and cheap computer has failed to materialize. While I find this concept exciting, I also think it is just one more way to further divide our society based on income &amp; class.
If our nation could just find a way to really support the educational opportunities of all the citizens, rich and poor, and make the necessary expenditures to ensure that happening- then these new systems would really make a huge difference in this ongoing paradigm shift we are in. If not, this will just be one more &quot;literacy&quot; the poor have no access to. I love Moodle for the very reason that it is   so affordable and egalitarian- something that can be used by people all over the world, even in poor countries. 
One other thought- I feel like higher education is very much a &quot;do-it-yourself&quot; proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting quote. Yes, I agree we must become &#8220;designers and makers of our own tools&#8221;, but I have an issue about equal access to these new tools for the less-than-well-off majority of people on this planet. As long as technology is cost-prohibitive for the poorer members of society, it will never really fulfill any of the promise it holds. I just went to Second LIfe to check it out, and discovered that one has to have a pretty fast computer and &#8216;net connection to participate. Satellite connections are no good- guess that leaves me out. We can barely get everyone using fairly modern computers- much less the latest and greatest. Access at libraries is being curtailed in various ways, and the promise of the fast and cheap computer has failed to materialize. While I find this concept exciting, I also think it is just one more way to further divide our society based on income &amp; class.<br />
If our nation could just find a way to really support the educational opportunities of all the citizens, rich and poor, and make the necessary expenditures to ensure that happening- then these new systems would really make a huge difference in this ongoing paradigm shift we are in. If not, this will just be one more &#8220;literacy&#8221; the poor have no access to. I love Moodle for the very reason that it is   so affordable and egalitarian- something that can be used by people all over the world, even in poor countries.<br />
One other thought- I feel like higher education is very much a &#8220;do-it-yourself&#8221; proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
